Anyone and especially @Coen @Max @Nigel @Massimo @bitacovir I suggest you bookmark this post if you want to stay in the discussion.
I think the first step is for us to organize the relevant pages we have on the wiki. So far I have this which should be a launching pad for everything else relevant on the wiki:
https://wiki.osarch.org/index.php?title=Building_Energy_Modeling_(BEM)
A simple search on the wiki shows how much we have, and how poorly some of it is organized.
https://wiki.osarch.org/index.php?search=BEM&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go
On wikipedia there are wikiprojects which have a page to coordinate improving articles around a specific subjects and help people find answers and interested contributors. We could make one for the "OSArch Planetary Crisis Project" (a less alarming name might be okay).
Me personally I cannot take the lead on this. I'm dealing with some long standing personal issues which require that I withdraw from responsibilities of any kind. But I find it hard to resist, as this post is beginning to show... . I'd be happy to share my ideas on how we can move forward, but I can't take the lead.
Other people who I know would be able to contribute here are
@topologic on how to create BEMs from inference
@theoryshaw & @Moult on how to structure relevant data
@teocomi on how to connect different software tools (and structure data) with speckle
@Cyril on many things, especially ongoing industry initiatives
That's the people that come to mind for me (but I might be a bit out of touch now)
Please feel free to tag other relevant people with a note on their skills. Then we can we can request their input on relevant topics.
Who is a skilled user of Ladybug Tools for relevant analysis?
Hej @Nigel how about someone make a list of interesting topics and we could arrange for great speakers and plan a webinar series?