@Moult said:
At a guess I'd say that the Sverchok folks have updated their API and self.idtree or self.idname no longer does what it once did :)
Hello, is there a release with this fix? Or can someone please explain how to do this? Noob here.
@leandrobp said:
Hello, is there a release with this fix? Or can someone please explain how to do this? Noob here.
Unfortunately, there is limited manpower to handle all the projects with the same priority level. So, while Dion is focused on BlenderBIM, we will need to be patient for this one. It would be great if people from ladybug tool community could take this and keep with the development. Do they have an active developers community outside of the official team?
@leandrobp I have now released an update with the fix, as well as a few other small touchups to bring it up to speed with Blender 3, the latest Ladybug Tool nodes, and Sverchok. Hopefully everybody who has been experiencing issues with LB Out will now have it fixed.
Additional developer manpower would be greatly appreciated :)
@Moult Thank you! I'll test it.
Additional developer manpower would be greatly appreciated :)
I'd love to contribute to this and many other projects, but I'm still learning the basic of programming in general and python. Hope I can help soon.
@Moult Sorry, but I didn't found the update, is it released?
@leandrobp yes, it is available on https://blenderbim.org/download.html
Added the Energy Modelling tag
https://github.com/nortikin/sverchok/blob/master/index.yaml
take in account, that menu was changed! LB need to be fixed to that changes (latest Sverchok 1.2.0)
https://github.com/nortikin/sverchok/commit/8192dcdd6de89908e2541432f688949a13ca252a also changes influence on registration. please, follow also sverchok chat https://t.me/sverchok_3d
Oh, Ladybug outdated. It is blender 4.0 outcome. so, if somebody is alive, update Ladybug stuff!
@Moult said:
For those unaware of Ladybug tools,
Please, update Ladybug tools, Blender 4.0 and so on. It not works
I would really like Ladybug for Blender 4 and preferable parts of Honeybee. At least the geometric parts.
As im sure the BlenderBim has more focus than these analytical tools, perhaps the VI-Suite can be an alternativ for temporary use until we see Ladybug and Honeybee comes around?
The VI-Suite tools can be shown here:
https://blogs.brighton.ac.uk/visuite/images/
However, VI-Suite uses blender file format, so any parametric studies with IFC nodes will not work. You need to export IFC with BlenderBim, save the file to Blender file format and change all items which contain "/" to "-" or any other character as VI-Suite for time being do not support "/".
An alternative is to use the donate button and set up recurring payment and indicate that development of this module should be prioritized. I have done this, but we need a critical mass to help prioritize development.
For users of ladybug tools, is there a significant advantage in doing these analysis on 3D solids as opposed to analyzing rasters? I think Whitebox Tools and some GIS-oriented programs can do some of these metrics.
@nikitron said:
@Moult said:
For those unaware of Ladybug tools,
Please, update Ladybug tools, Blender 4.0 and so on. It not works
We are in times where Sustainability is a "must" in everything. Ladybug tools "must" be in any OpenSource workflow.
BlenderBim and Ladybug were the reasons I started to use Blender two years ago. Sure, I can use Ladybug in grashopper but it is much harder to integrate into an efficiant workflow.
To revive this thread and save all the effort that was put implementing ladybug-blender, I've updated the https://github.com/ladybug-tools/ladybug-blender to support the latest version of sverchok. No other changes added, only api update and it seems to work (tested on Blender 3.6.11, on Blender 4.0+ sverchok is throwing lots of errors not sure if it's supported completely by sverchok).
Latest build:
Would this build of ladybug tool yield same issue as VI-Suite where the "/" sign in the IFC scheme will make non radiant material? Also, are you the main programmer for ladybug tool now for BB?
Would this build of ladybug tool yield same issue as VI-Suite where the "/" sign in the IFC scheme will make non radiant material?
No idea, it works the same way as before sverchok made changes to API.
Also, are you the main programmer for ladybug tool now for BB?
I work on BlenderBIM, just wanted to help out with ladybug tools as the changes wasn't really related to the ladybug internals but just how it was integrated with sverchok.
@Andrej730 Thank you, I was hoping the LB add-on would come back to live soon. I've tried to get it working but I am getting this message:
Any idea what is going on?
@pstrokap said:
@Andrej730 Thank you, I was hoping the LB add-on would come back to live soon. I've tried to get it working but I am getting this message:
Any idea what is going on?
What version of sverchok and Blender?
Blender 3.6.11
Sverchok 1.2.0
Blender Windows portable (.zip), not the installer
@pstrokap can you please try this one?
https://github.com/Andrej730/ladybug-blender/releases/tag/ladybug-blender-240515